Magazine
Art and medicine have been in conversation for as long as people have tried to understand and heal the body. From anatomy to art therapy, this is where creativity meets care.
In this article
We tend to keep art and medicine in separate drawers. One belongs to the gallery and the concert hall, the other to the clinic and the operating room. Yet the two have been in conversation for as long as human beings have tried to understand the body and to heal it. Painters have studied anatomy, doctors have drawn what they found, and communities the world over have used music, image, and story to comfort the sick and mark the passage between life and death. Arts and medicine is the field where those two ways of knowing meet. At CreARTivity we cover it because it sits exactly where our interests live: the human body, the creative act, and the ways art gives shape to experience.
In the simplest terms, arts and medicine is the meeting point of creative practice and health care. It runs in two directions at once. Art works in the service of medicine, helping people heal, cope, communicate, and understand the body. And medicine works its way into art, because illness, anatomy, and mortality have always been among the great subjects that artists return to. Neither direction is new, and neither is a novelty. Both are old, serious traditions with their own history, their own practitioners, and a growing body of evidence behind them.
The most direct link is therapeutic. The creative arts therapies are established clinical professions in which trained practitioners use an art form to support a person’s health. Art therapy uses drawing, painting, and making. Music therapy uses listening, playing, and songwriting. Dance and movement therapy uses the body, and drama therapy uses role and story. Expressive writing rounds out the family. These are not craft hours to pass the time. They are practiced in hospitals, rehabilitation units, mental health services, schools, eldercare, and hospice settings, often alongside conventional treatment.
What they share is a simple insight. When words alone are not enough, whether because of trauma, illness, dementia, or the sheer difficulty of saying how one feels, an art form can offer another way through. A stroke patient may recover speech through the rhythm and melody of song. A child in a cancer ward may say through paint what they cannot say to an adult. A person living with dementia may light up at a piece of music from their youth long after other memories have faded. The art becomes both an outlet and a bridge.
The second link is older still. Long before photography, the only way to record what lay beneath the skin was to draw it, and so the study of the body became a branch of art. In the Renaissance, Leonardo da Vinci filled notebooks with anatomical studies of astonishing accuracy, and in 1543 the physician Andreas Vesalius published a landmark treatise whose detailed illustrations changed how medicine saw the human form. That tradition never stopped. It became the modern professions of medical and scientific illustration and animation, in which artists translate the complexity of the body into images a surgeon, a student, or a patient can actually understand.
Art has also turned the experience of illness into some of its most powerful work. The Mexican painter Frida Kahlo made her own injured body and years of pain the center of her art, producing self-portraits that are now studied as much for their honesty about suffering as for their beauty. Centuries of religious and secular art wrestled with plague, mortality, and healing, from images of saints and hospitals to the quiet still lifes that reminded viewers life is brief. In all of it, art does something medicine cannot do on its own. It gives the experience of the body a voice.
In recent decades the relationship has become a movement in its own right, often called arts in health. Hospitals commission art for their walls and musicians for their wards, and some health systems now offer social prescribing, referring patients to cultural and creative activities as part of their care rather than a substitute for it.
The case for this is no longer only anecdotal. In 2019 the World Health Organization published a major review by Daisy Fancourt and Saoirse Finn that gathered more than 900 publications, including analyses covering some 3,000 studies, into a single picture of the evidence. It grouped the benefits into two broad areas: prevention and promotion, where the arts support child development, healthy behavior, and social connection, and management and treatment, where they help with mental illness, chronic and neurological conditions, and end of life care. The review’s careful conclusion was that the arts can play a real role in both mental and physical health. That is why arts and medicine matters. It humanizes care, gives patients agency, and reminds a technical profession of the whole person in the bed.
You do not need a medical degree to explore this field. Readers who are drawn to it can look into the recognized creative arts therapy professions and the training they require, volunteer with an arts in health program at a local hospital, or seek out the growing number of museum tours and workshops designed around wellbeing. Anyone who has ever felt steadied by a song or a sketchbook already knows the core of it from the inside. The rest is history, evidence, and craft, and it is well worth the journey.
About the author
CreARTivity Educational Team
The Educational Team writes CreARTivity's reference work: histories of artistic disciplines, guides to cultural traditions, and the county-by-county surveys of arts institutions across New Jersey. Its brief is to be useful to someone meeting a subject for the first time and still worth reading to someone who already knows it. Edited by Marie Juliane David.
Your email will not be published. Comments are moderated before they appear.